Although I try to write about power I make an unusual
side step now to heart rate. Many of us who train to improve (and want to
measure improvement) probably use heart rate as a measure, because
unfortunately power meters are just not cheap (although the market is becoming
quite booming with a lot of new entrants which is of course good for price
decreases).
If you look on the internet there are a lot of
different ways to set your heart rate zones. Based on Karvonen, Zoladz, Dr. Coggan, Friel, Edwards, British Cycling Federation guidelines, and so on. I will
show my zones based on two methods: Karvonen and Coggan.
Based on the Karvonen method you take your maximal
heart rate and your heart rate at rest. Based on that your heart rate zones are
calculated as follows:
HR reserve = HR rest + (HR max - HR rest) * X%
X represents the percentage bounds of the heart rate
zones. Based on my powerfiles I have seen that my maximal achieved heart rate
is 189. My rest heart rate (lying down or sitting and not doing anything) is 40
(I have had lower, but 40 is a reasonable average).
Dr. Coggan which is a leading author on training with
a powermeter and the analytics which defines the heart rate zones based on the
lactate treshold heart rate. This heart rate comes with an FTP test. Based on
on hour tests I have done my FTP heart rate comes around 168 on average.
Interesting isn't it? To make things more complicated
a few years ago I did a lactate test and I turned out my lactate treshold (LT)
heart rate was in this area. Knowing what I know now about training I should
have asked him: what was the testing protocol (in relation to wattage) and what
level of mmol/l he used to get the number for my heart rate at LT. My lactate
heart rate came out at 150...how nice that it is exactly 150......;) Based on
that I got 3 zones:
115-128 Extensive Endurance (for building period and
recovery rides)
128-142 Intensive Endurance (for increasing aerobic
level)142-165 Interval training long (for resistance)
How can I place my rather steady state effort today
with an average heart rate of 157? Seeing it black and white I have done Lactate
Treshold effort based on Karvonen, a ferm Tempo ride based on Coggan and a
resistance training based on the lactate test zones.
In perspective I do not see it too black and white. These
zones are just some guidelines, nothing more nothing less. Basically zones do
not exist. It's rather gray.
But then, which zones do I prefer? To be honest if I
have to use heart rate a training guide I prefer to use the Coggan scale,
because I think it is better to relate it to treshold heart rate than to
maximal heart rate. This is same argument as defining power training based on
treshold power instead of power at for example VO2max.
I keep it at: I have done a nice Temporide with parts
at Lactate Treshold. And that quite matches my feeling ;)
2h03m, 67km, AS 33.2km/h, AH 157, IF 0.8, NP (est) 235, TSS 135
No comments:
Post a Comment